February 3, 2011

What would you call a merged entity created from the marriage of RSA and Aviva? RSiva, perhaps. Or Avisa? Doesn’t really matter, because Insurance Times claims it will never happen.

How do they know? Simples: they asked Barrie Corney, analyst with Scottish “stockbroking firm” Panmure Gordon. Or rather they cobbled something together based on an investment note what he wrote.

A merger between the two remaining giants of the UK insurance scene would make sense, Corney claims, but will not happen due to a surfeit of hurdles.

With both companies having recently made multimillion GBP bids for some or all of one another – with Aviva most recently offering 140 Niños for RSA – speculation is, as they say, rife. A merger would at least stop the pair arguing about which is the oldest surviving insurance company in the land.

“Whilst we can see the logic for such a combination,” Bazza wrote, “as highlighted by RSA when it made its offer for most of Aviva’s non-life operation last summer, we think that RSA’s current share price will preclude any such acquisition.”

“A valuation towards £7bn or circa 208p a share,” for the “well managed” RSA “seems highly speculative and rather unlikely in our view,” he continued, unlike this story which comes to an abrupt halt right here.


ShareShare


What our clients say about us

All my questions regarding my claim were answered in full and in a very clear and concise manor. I was impressed with the help provided to ease my mind.
Mr. R - London